Skip to content

11-08-23 FBI Organizes Almost All Terror Plots In the US // FBI Organiza Casi todos los complots terroristas en los EE.UU. // 联邦调查局在美国举办,几乎所有的恐怖阴谋

By Russia Today

Agents are sent in to converse within the community, find suspects that could potentially carry out “lone wolf” attacks and then, more or less, encourage them to do so.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article28933.htm

 

11-08-23 Wikileaks // Wikileaks // 维基解密

 

PATRIOT Act order unsealed

US Espionage Investigation Against WikiLeaks

By Wikileaks
August 23, 2011 
Information Clearing House” –  Further proof has emerged of the United States secret Grand Jury investigation into Julian Assange and WikiLeaks. Further information has been demanded on the organization and its founder for the US courts, this time under the PATRIOT Act. The Grand Jury has been meeting in Alexandria, Washington DC trying to work up an espionage case against the organization’s founder Julian Assange. The latest information demanded is anything held by WikiLeaks DNS host, Dynadot in California, regarding wikileaks.org, WikiLeaks and Julian Assange.

WikiLeaks have just received a copy of the recently unsealed court Order from the United States, signed by a US magistrate judge on the 4th of January 2011. Using the terms of the PATRIOT Act the Order was issued to Dynadot, the domain registrars for wikileaks.org, for all information they hold on WikiLeaks, Julian Assange and wikileaks.org.

The Order demands Dynadot handover the following information for the time period November 1st 2009 to present, within three days of the date of the Order:

1. Subscriber names, user names, screen names, or other identities; 2. mailing addresses, residential addresses, business addresses, e-mail addresses, and other contact information; 3. connection records, or record of session times and durations; 4. length of service (including start date) and typos of service utilized; 5. telephone or instrument number or other subscriber number or identity; including any temporarily assigned network address; and 6. means and source of payment for such service (including any credit card or bank account number) and billing records.

Also:

1. records of user activity for any connections made to or from the Account 2. non-content information associated with the contents of any communication or file stored by or for the account(s), such as the source and destination email addresses and IP addresses. 3. Correspondence and notes of records related to the account

WikiLeaks do not know what, if any, information Dynodot provided the US courts with. This demand follows a subpoena earlier this year to Twitter for the information it holds on WikiLeaks, Julian Assange and some of his associates. 

For further information please read the full Dynadot court Order here.

Help support WikiLeaks through these attacks.

11-08-25 Am I Stupid? // ¿Soy estúpido? // 我愚蠢吗?

Fwd: Re: Citizen’s right to stop illegal conduct by public official

Q: My sheriff is poaching… My judge is corrupt… 

    Is there anything I could do to stop it? 

A: Not much, really… Am I stupid?

 

 Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 03:55:50 +0300

To: lawsters@googlegroups.com
From: joseph zernik <jz12345@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: citizen’s right to stop illegal conduct by public official

Back to the question itself: How to stop illegal conduct by a government official  -

Some laws, which were specifically enacted during the Reconstruction Era, following the Civil War to stop unlawful conduct by public officials are:

  • Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights, 42 USC 1983  

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officers judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

  • Corresponding jurisdictional statute, 28 U.S.C. 1343
  • Corresponding criminal statues  18 USC 242


However, as described previously, the US courts do not observe this section.   For example, in Zernik v Connor et al (08-cv-01550) I duly filed under this section a complaint under 1983 against some 10 California judges in the US Distinct Court, Central District of California, for conduct amounting to racketeering.

In response:

  • The clerk of the court refused to issue summonses, and
  • The court went on conducting a simulated litigation under this caption, months after I refused to oppose a motion for dismissal…

For review of the true legal interpretation of the law you may read:

  • Sword and Shield: A Practical Approach to Section 1983 Litigation

      http://www.amazon.com/Section-1983-sword-shield-violations/dp/0897071107

This law pertains to unlawful conduct relative to deprivation of rights, poaching is unlikely to be addressed by this law.

JZ

P.S. Standard Disclaimer:
1) The writer is not an attorney, and has no legal education.
2) The older I get the more I realize how clueless I am!
__________

Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:36:38 +0300
To: lawsters@googlegroups.com
From: joseph zernik <jz12345@earthlink.net>
Subject: RE: Citizens’ right to stop illegal conduct by judges?

Here are some explanations regarding the de facto law of United States:

1) My understanding is that you might appeal only a valid appealable order or judgment of a US courts, not any hand-written piece of paper written by anybody, even if that person is represented as a US judge.

2) In a similar situation in the US District Court, Central District of California, the Clerk of the Court refused to issue summonses.  When I petitioned the refusal to issue summonses to the 9th Circuit, the petition was denied, albeit, with an unsigned, unauthenticated order.  The lower courts would not engage in such unlawful conduct, unless they knew that they were fully supported by the US courts of appeals.

3) In a similar situation –  the simulated habeas corpus of Richard Fine –  a simulated appeal was conducted by the 9th circuit court of appeals, and then a simulated petition in the US Supreme Court.
I lawfully filed evidence to the Supreme Court of the simulated nature of the proceedings in the US District Court, Central District of California and the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit.  Surprise, surprise, the papers were “returned” by SCOTUS court counsel Danny Bickell (neither a Deputy Clerk, nor a Justice of SCOTUS), after being stamped “Received”.  In short, SCOTUS as well supports the practice. [1]

4) In the US Court, Central District of California, I was even told directly by the Deputy Clerk in the Intake Department – the “Pro Se Clerk”. – that any paper which included evidence against California judges would be denied filing. [2]

5) The experience is not only mine, William Windsor experienced the same in the US District Court, DC [3], and Richard Fine experience the same in the US District Court, Central District of California.

6) The practice can be summarized as a Federal Rule of Court:
Any papers, which include valid evidence of judicial corruption are exempt from First Amendment rights, and must be denied filing in the US Courts. [4]

I suggest that you read the links below, and update yourself regarding the de facto law of the United States.

LINKS:
[1] 10-07-01 Complaint against US Supreme Court Counsel Danny Bickell for Alleged Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/
[2] 09-04-09 Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) at the US District Court, Central District of California, Dkt #105: Compiled Records of Perverted Discrepancy Notices
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39773867/
[3] 11-05-30 PRESS RELEASE: Judge Richard Leon, US District Court,DC  master of the Leave to file denied
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56612919/
[4] 10-10-20 The US Courts Established a Policy Excluding Any Papers Pertaining to Judicial Corruption from the First Amendment Right to File Petitions
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39788364/
__________

At 04:39 AM 8/24/2011, W wrote:

I’m not sure that I understand, Dr. Jose.  One does not require leave to file a petition such as you mention, if indeed, that is what it was.

Sooo, it sounds like under the guise of “leave to file denied” the judge dismissed your petition without hearing.  And that is the appeala ble issue.

W
__________


Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 04:02:45 +0300
To: lawsters@googlegroups.com
From: jz12345@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: citizen right to stop illegal conduct by public official

Not exactly addressing your question… but close…

I have sued in US District Court, Washington DC US DOJ, FBI and others, under “Petition to Compel US Officer to Perform his Duties.” (Zernik v Melson et al – same Melson who later became infamous as Gun Walker)

By then, I had no surprise, when the outcome was simulated litigation, where my papers were returned to me, with hand inscription by US Judge Richard Leon “Leave to File Denied”…

JZ

LINKS:
[1] 11-05-30 PRESS RELEASE: Judge Richard Leon, US District Court,DC  master of the Leave to file denied
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56612919/
__________

 

At 03:05 AM 8/24/2011, JP wrote:

this is the core question

__________

 

 

On Tue, 8/23/11, DE wrote:

From: DE

Subject: citizen right to stop illegal conduct by public official

To: lawsters@googlegroups.com

Date: Tuesday, August 23, 2011, 3:14 PM

i have info here in idaho that our local sheriff is poaching elk and deer. i have one eyewitness and possibly a second who is in alaska working at the moment. i sent in a public records request to see if the sheriff had any license to hunt the elk he was seen cleaning. the local fish and game state the info is confidential and exempt from disclosure.

is there any statutes either federal or local that address whether a private citizen can sue to stop illegal conduct by an elected official?

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “Lawsters” group.
To post to this group, send email to lawsters@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lawsters+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lawsters?hl=en.

 

11-08-25 Welcome Ecuador! // Bienvenido Ecuador! // 欢迎厄瓜多尔!

Last New Visitor

Ecuador 
Visited August 25, 2011

11-08-23 Natives are Restive! // Los nativos están inquietos! // 当地人躁动不安!

The De Jure Grand Jury Movement


  1. This site may harm your computer.
    Fully Informed Grand Jurors Alliance, FIGJA, Jural Societies, FIGJA exposes FIJA, law research, Christian Common Law, American Common Law, Grand Jury

  2. forums.wtf.com › Home › Forums › On-Topic › The Issues – Cached
    13 posts – 3 authors – Last post: 2 Apr 2010

    Washington (CNN) — A domestic extremist group has sent letters to more than 30 U.S. governors demanding they resign, the Department of 

  3. http://www.newworldorderwar.com/de-jure-grand-jury-restore-america-pr… – Cached

    One Response to “De Jure Grand Jury – Restore America Project”. Not valid says: August 30, 2010 at 3:49 pm. I don’t understand why this site supports online 

  4. dailypaul.com › Forums › Daily Paul Liberty Forum – Cached

    3 Mar 2010 – Folks, in a few short weeks, every republic will have a duly seated de jure grand jury and chapter of the Guardians of the Free Republics. 

  5. beforeitsnews.com/…/Arizona_de_jure_Grand_Jury_provides_Rem… – Cached

    26 Nov 2010 – In a precedent setting event the Arizona Republic convened a de jure Grand Jury, the first one to be lawfully assembled in 150 years, 

  6. sites.google.com/…/flacountydejuregrandjuries/what-is-a-de-jure-grand-jur

    To the best of my understanding, we are creating a De Jure Grand Jury for the first time in Florida since 1861. This will be the highest court venue in the 

  7. 4 Apr 2010 – They call themselves the Guardians of the Free Republics under God. Men like Samuel Thomas Kennedy, Thomas Bradford Schaults, 

  8. 2 Apr 2010 – A De Jure Grand jury made up of 26 Nevada Republic citizens are committed to re-establishing a De Jure government in your state please 

  9. 4 Feb 2010 – The “de jure Grand Juries” is an illusion – sounds nice but by what authority and Power can 24 people proceed. None. 

11-08-23 Protecting Corruption // La protección de la Corrupción // 保护腐败

 

Windsor denied audience with Grand Jury

Tuesday, 23 August 2011 13:31
William M. Windsor
screws-old-080522b0215-1500000-192w

William M. Windsor was denied his audience with the Fulton County Grand Jury when he returned today to testify after being invited back after his meeting with the Grand Jurors on Friday.

Folks, I am spitting nails.  This is one of the maddest I have been throughout this whole ordeal

 

 

READ THE FULL STORY:

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=449:windsor-denied-audience-with-grand-jury&catid=43:judicial-misconduct-complaints&Itemid

11-08-22 Bank of America Wikileaks files destroyed… // Bank of America archivos de Wikileaks destruidos …// 美国银行Wikileaks的文件被毁…

Comment:

Obviously, Bank of America was more effective than the US government in protecting itself against Wikileaks…

____

The Raw Story

Some of WikiLeaks’ Bank of America files destroyed by former spokesman

By Reuters
Monday, August 22nd, 2011 — 7:44 pm

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Some internal Bank of America files obtained by WikiLeaks have been destroyed, according to a former close collaborator of Julian Assange, the whistleblowing website’s founder.

In an email to Reuters, Daniel Domscheit-Berg, who last year was fired by Assange as WikiLeaks’ co-spokesman, confirmed that he had destroyed “roundabout” 3,000 submissions WikiLeaks received related to Bank of America.

Domscheit-Berg said that he had decided to destroy the material “in the interest of the security of sources.” In the past he had alleged that the source-protection system used by WikiLeaks under Assange’s stewardship was inadequate.

READ THE FULL STORY:

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/08/22/some-of-wikileaks-bank-of-america-files-destroyed-by-former-spokesman/?utm_source=Raw+Story+Daily+Update&utm_campaign=5cdfd3b420-8_23_118_23_2011&utm_medium=email

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.